Costs reduced to rent
Many comparisons equate the rent with the total cost. Yet gross rent is only one part. Operation, maintenance and adjustments are often left out.
A low price per square metre says little about the real cost burden.
A realistic cost comparison beyond rent and square metres.
Most office decisions do not fail because of the rent. They fail because of what never appears in the cost comparison.
Many comparisons equate the rent with the total cost. Yet gross rent is only one part. Operation, maintenance and adjustments are often left out.
A low price per square metre says little about the real cost burden.
Office decisions tie up internal resources permanently. Search, fit-out, coordination and operation take up management, IT and administration.
That time rarely shows up in calculations, yet it directly affects focus.
Many relevant costs do not arise at move-in but spread across the term. Retrofits, conversions and space changes are missing from the initial calculation.
Looking only at the start means clearly underestimating the total cost.
The calculation below shows the real running costs under standard market conditions. Same location, same team, two models.
A range, because nine items fluctuate individually
One amount, predictable every month
The result surprises most people: both models cost almost the same per month. The difference is not the price but the effort, the risk and the commitment – and the question of who takes care of operation, technology and breakdowns.
Economically, a classic office resembles buying a car, while a flex office resembles a leasing or subscription model.
Like buying a car: committed once, responsible for good.
Like leasing: a predictable rate, responsibility with the provider.
Office decisions look comparable at first glance. In practice they differ in the detail, and that is exactly where the biggest mistakes happen.
Many problems follow recurring patterns: space that becomes too small faster than planned, or contracts that promise flexibility and never deliver it.
Offers can be compared, markets cannot. Between operators, concepts and contract logics there are differences that only show up in daily use.
A good office decision does not only work at move-in. It has to hold up across the whole term through growth, change or correction.
Tell me briefly what you are looking for and I will send you a selection of matching spaces and prices by tomorrow.
The key questions about the cost of your office, answered clearly and directly.
In Berlin the real total cost of a classic office of around 300 sqm is roughly 11,180 to 12,750 euros per month. A comparable flex office with 20 workstations costs about 11,800 euros, but that includes service charges, electricity, internet, furniture, cleaning and maintenance.
Mainly operation and upkeep: maintenance and inspections, insurance, equipment leasing, office supplies and the depreciation of furniture. On top of that comes internal time for search, fit-out and organisation, which appears in hardly any calculation.
Usually not. Once every item is counted, both models sit close together per month. The difference is structural: with a flex office the amount is predictable and operation is outsourced, while a classic office has nine separate items that fluctuate.
Because it only reflects the base rent. In the example the base rent accounts for only about three quarters of the monthly total. The rest comes from operation, technology and adjustments, some of it years after move-in.
Homepage Seacrh work by adding this and script added on the page head

